The distribution

What the curve looks like

A Lorenz curve plots cumulative share of people against cumulative share of money. The straight diagonal is perfect equality — the poorest 40% of creators would hold 40% of the fees. The bowed line is what the chain actually reports. The area between them is the inequality.

Lorenz curve of pump.fun creator fee income

By decile

The same data without the geometry: creators sorted by measured fees and cut into ten equal-sized groups.

Percentiles

A Gini coefficient of 0 is perfect equality and 1 is one person holding everything. For reference, national income Gini coefficients generally sit between roughly 0.25 and 0.65 — but those measure whole economies with wages and transfers, not a single fee market, so the comparison is a sense of scale rather than a like-for-like.

Read the concentration figures on this page as one sample, not as a standing fact about pump.fun. Creators are sampled from the most recent coins, and that population turns over within hours, so each scan measures a largely different set of people. In a distribution this heavy-tailed the Gini and every top-N share are dominated by whether one large earner happens to be included — across consecutive scans on the day this was built, the top 1% share moved between 34% and 63%. What does not move is the direction: the mean has been two orders of magnitude above the median in every scan. The median is the stable figure here, which is why it is the one on the front page, and why it carries a confidence interval.